Fanfic Forensics

  • blog/twitter
  • phd research
  • translations
  • cv
  • contact
Home › Blogs › Nele's blog

Where's the "Explain why taxpayers should give you money for this research" section?

Nele — Tue, 02/02/2010 - 22:11

I spent the last couple of weeks fine-tuning a grant application. Everything hinges on this one three-page text: one wrong word or fuzzy sentence and bam, the application goes straight in the bin. That means reading and rereading and spell-checking and putting in more jargon ad nauseam, and soon advisors start giving contradictory advice as to what should be in there, the page limit becomes a nightmare, and by the deadline you're quite ready to ritually burn the monster and dump the ashes in the cat box.<br /><br />There's one thing about grant-writing that always bothers me (apart from its general unpleasantness, which is unavoidable). Every time, without fail, I have to explain in exquisite detail what my research contributes to certain academic fields, what the previous research is, how my theoretical framework and methodology work, and so forth. That's good. But never am I asked to articulate precisely why I deserve a pile of tax money from my government so I can ramble on about fanwork without interruption for four years straight. There's no section where I have to explain what my research is going to contribute to the vast world outside of academia. There should be. I want that section.The broader relevance of my research is one of its most important aspects.<br /><br />Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that all humanities research should result in immediate, quantifiable and tangible benefits. I do believe that writing up the ways one's research benefits society at large would be a pretty useful thinking exercise for many humanities scholars. Let's have less whining about those humanities-bashing Philistines, more awareness about Important Issues, and more activist scholarship. That would be nice.

  • academia
  • Nele's blog
  • Add new comment

On this site

Talk about the cultural economics of fanwork, data gathering and comparative research between Japanese dojinshi and English-language fanwork, and legal, economic and cultural policy issues related to dojinshi and to fanwork in general. This site is a personal research playground cum treasure hoard, and also a resource in the making about the function of dojinshi in Japan's system of cultural production. Warning: mature or triggering content in fanwork may be discussed here. See research ethics.

PhD research data (WIP)

  • Project basics
  • DRAFT thesis text
    • Introduction
    • Methodology
      • Methodologies commonly used for fanfic and dojinshi research
      • Development of a theoretical framework and methodology for this project
        • The 'open work' according to Umberto Eco
        • Arguments for viewing fanwork as 'open work'
        • Advantages to viewing fanwork as 'open work'
        • An open work-based methodology in practice
    • Description of samples
      • Sample selection process
    • Analysis of samples
    • Hypothesis based on analysis
    • What is this good for?
    • Conclusion
  • Fanwork data sets and dictionaries
    • Dojinshi data set
    • Fanfics data set
    • Japanese-English dictionary of dojinshi and fan studies terminology
    • Visual grammar of manga dictionary
  • References
  • Planning and to do's

Search this site

Favourite links

  • Japanese Studies K.U. Leuven
  • K.U. Leuven Japanese-Dutch dictionary
  • 同人用語の基礎知識 (Basic dojinshi terminology)
  • Organization for Transformative Works (OTW)
  • Metafandom
  • PhD Comics
  • When Fangirls Attack

Follow me on

  • FriendFeed
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Dreamwidth
  • LiveJournal
  • InsaneJournal
  • Diigo

Powered by Drupal, an open source content management system
  • blog/twitter
  • phd research
  • translations
  • cv
  • contact

Creative Commons License